SO YOU DON"T LIKE THE TERM "GARBAGE."?

 Let's see, we have a Presidential Candidate who;

- Tried to overthrow a Lawfully Elected Government.

- Is friendly with Dictators throughout the world.

- Insults and Degrades Ethnicities across the U.S.

- Is a convicted Criminal and been held Civilly Liable

for Sexually Assaulting a Woman.

- Wants to be a Dictator from day one.

- Wants to use the Military and Federal Authorities to go

after his enemies.

- Seeks to end Universal Health Care.

- Misquotes and wants to abuse the 2nd Amendment.

- Has no idea that the following terms:

Refugee.

Resident Alien.

Illegal Immigrant.

Are not defined the same way.

- Wants to make sure the Wealthiest get the biggest and

longest tax breaks.

- Believes Religious Fanatics should run our Schools and

Courts.

and on and on...

You don't like the term "Garbage" to describe Trumps supporters? 

WHAT TERM WOULD YOU USE TO DESCRIBE A GROUP

VOTING FOR A CANDIDATE TRYING TO DESTROY OUR

CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC? WHO HEARS THE THINGS 
 
HE AND HIS CRONIES HAVE TO SAY, AND STILL CHEER HIM ON.

SO YOU DONT LIKE THE TERM "GARBAGE."?

REALLY?

REMEMBER THIS? WHEN FRAUD STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE. PART 7.

 

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. PART 7.

IT IS THIS BAD...

Before I continue with an Analysis of the 2016 Presidential Election, I would like to point out a couple of things:

-  All the Statistics and Numbers I use in this SERIES OF POSTS ARE AVAILABLE AND EASY TO FIND ON THE INTERNET. NUMEROUS SITES CARRY THE "OFFICIAL" ELECTION RETURNS FOR EACH STATE, AND THE U.S AS A WHOLE. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE FIGURES, AT LEAST HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL HONESTY TO BACK IT WITH FACTUAL DATA. IT CAN BE AS EASY AS GOING ON WIKIPEDIA, AND ENTERING "2016" OR "2012" ELECTION. However, if you don't want to use WIKIPEDIA, I'm sure your News Outlet of Choice will contain all the information you need.

-  The RUSSIAN CONNECTION TO THIS ELECTION, WHILE DISTURBING, IS NOT THE REAL STORY.  AS I SAID IN THE LAST POST, YOU CANNOT "QUANTIFY" THE AMOUNT OR NUMBER OF VOTES THAT WERE GAINED OR LOST BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LEAKING INFORMATION DETRIMENTAL TO HILLARY CLINTON.

EVEN IF THIS INTERFERENCE WENT AS FAR AS HACKING INTO SYSTEMS TO ALTER

VOTER RETURNS, IT LEAVES ONE MORE IMPORTANT FACTOR TO CONSIDER:

IT WAS NOT RUSSIAN POLITICIANS WHO CERTIFIED, AND SIGNED OFF ON THE "OFFICIAL NUMBERS." IT WAS AMERICAN ELECTION OFFICIALS WHO DID THAT. AS IMPROBABLE AS THESE TOTALS SEEM TO BE IN SOME CASES, NO ONE CONTESTED THEM.  

THAT IS THE REAL STORY.

I'll leave you with another example:

PENNSYLVANIA- 2012 ELECTION. TOTAL # OF DEMOCRAT\REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,670,708.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,990,274.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES- 2,680,434.

MARGIN OF DEMOCRATIC VICTORY- 309,840 VOTES.

PENNSYLVANIA- 2016 ELECTION.  TOTAL # OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,897,174.  UP +226,466 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,926,441 VOTES, LOSS OF 63,833 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES- 2,970,733 VOTES, GAIN OF +290,299 VOTES.

HERE IS A BREAKDOWN:

The TOTAL # OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN VOTES INCREASED +226,466 votes from

2012-2016.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY LOST 63,833 VOTES BETWEEN 2012 AND 2016, OR ABOUT -2.1%. In itself, that's 

not a drastic decline. It would be considered a result that is well within normal expectations.

HOWEVER, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NUMBERS ARE ANOTHER MATTER. AN INCREASE OF +290,299 VOTES REPRESENTS ABOUT AN + 10.8% INCREASE. 

This number, (+290,299), is more than 4 times the number 

of votes that the Democrats lost.

TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NEEDED A SCENARIO LIKE THE FOLLOWING TO HAPPEN:

EVERY SINGLE VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN 2012, HAD TO DO SO AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434 VOTES.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR EITHER THE DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, HAD TO CHOOSE REPUBLICAN: +226,466 VOTES.

THAT TOTAL= 2,906,900 IS STILL SHORT OF THE "OFFICIAL" TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES.

HOW COULD THIS BE? THE REPUBLICANS WERE STILL 63,833 VOTES SHORT OF THE FINAL NUMBER. WELL, GO BACK A FEW PARAGRAPHS AND CHECK OUT THE NUMBER OF VOTES THE DEMOCRATS LOST FROM 2012-2016= -63,833.

TO ACHIEVE A TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, HERE IS RUNDOWN OF WHAT THE REPUBLICANS NEEDED TO HAPPEN:

EVERY REPUBLICAN VOTER FROM 2012, RETURNS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO SELECTS EITHER DEM.\REP. IN 2016, CHOOSES REP.: 226,466.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 63,833 VOTERS THE DEM. PARTY LOST BETWEEN 2012- 2016, RETURNS TO THE POLLS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN.

2,680,434 + 226,466 + 63,833 = 2,970,733.

THIS IS LUDICROUS. NO REASONABLE INDIVIDUAL WHO
LOOKS AT THESE NUMBERS COULD TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY. 

TO ALL DEMOCRATS, PROGRESSIVES, AND FRIENDS AND ALLIES OF THE U.S. ACROSS THE GLOBE: THIS ELECTION WAS A SHAM. 

DON'T BELIEVE ME? PLEASE CHECK THE RESULTS YOURSELF. DON'T TAKE MY WORD, GO OVER THEM CAREFULLY. 

ANY DEMOCRATIC LEADER WHO SAW THESE RESULTS, AND DIDN'T QUESTION THEM, IS AS GUILTY AS ANY REPUBLICAN WHO MAY HAVE SET THIS SCAM INTO MOTION. 

ANY DEMOCRATIC LEADER...

I HAVE BROKEN DOWN ONLY 2 STATES, WISCONSIN, AND PENNSYLVANIA. STAY TUNED....

DONALD TRUMP AND EXTREMIST POLITICS: WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS. (UPDATED).

 WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS.

THEREFORE; LIES, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, HATE SPEECH, ETC. ARE NOT TO BE
AVOIDED, BUT USED WHEN IT FURTHERS OUR AGENDA.

WORDS AND TERMS LIKE:

GOD AND RELIGION.

LOYALTY AND PATRIOTISM.

ETHICS AND MORALITY.

LAW.

FAMILY.

RIGHTS AND DUTIES.

...ARE MEANINGLESS, SO THEY CAN BE USED AND DEFINED ANY WAY THAT FITS OUR NEEDS. THIS ALLOWS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DUPE THOSE WHO SEEK TO LIVE BY CERTAIN PRINCIPLES THAT THESE WORDS AND TERMS MEAN TO THEM ON A PERSONAL LEVEL.

THE ONLY RESPONSIBILITY WE HAVE IS TO OURSELVES, ANY PAIN AND SUFFERING INFLICTED ON OTHERS IS THEIR TOUGH LUCK. PROMISES WE MAKE ARE ILLUSIONS, TO BE KEPT OR DISCARDED AS WE SEE FIT.

INSTILLING "TRUST" IS A TOOL THAT LEAVES OPEN OPPORTUNITIES TO ACT WITHOUT
ANY OPPOSITION. HOW? "TRUST" IS ALSO AN ILLUSION FOR IT CAN BE ALTERED, WITH 

THE MEANING CHANGED TO SUIT OUR PURPOSES. IT ALSO MEANS NEVER ALLOWING THE

OPPOSITION TO TIE US DOWN TO A SINGLE COHERENT DEFINITION THAT CAN BE USED

TO HINDER OUR FUTURE PLANS.

REMEMBER THIS? WHEN FRAUD STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE. PART 6.

 

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. PART 6.

(BELOW REPRINTED FROM PART 5.)

THE REPUBLICAN TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FROM 2012-2016 INCREASED +2,046,375.

MORE THAN HALF OF THAT INCREASE CAME FROM ONLY 4 STATES.

CARE TO GUESS WHICH ONES?

MICHIGAN. +164,287.

PENNSYLVANIA.  +290,299.

OHIO.  +179,568.

FLORIDA.  +454,439.

TOTAL: 1,088,593.

***************************************************************************************************************

To help put this in proper perspective, consider the following:

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY INCREASED THEIR NATIONAL VOTE COUNT BY +2,046,375. 

(2012- 2016).

THE ABOVE 4 STATES ACCOUNT FOR +1,088,593 OF THIS INCREASE.(53.2%)

THAT MEANS THAT THE REMAINING 46 STATES WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR 

THE OTHER 957,782 VOTES. (46.8%).

MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, FLORIDA had a combined increase in REPUBLICAN

VOTES SO LARGE, THAT IT SURPASSED ALL OTHER STATES ADDED TOGETHER.

However, sometimes huge gains in NUMBERS OF VOTES WASN'T ENOUGH TO CLINCH A VICTORY. THAT, AND THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOMEONE MIGHT REALIZE THAT RUSSIAS HACKING, AND RELEASE OF DATA DETRIMENTAL TO HILLARY CLINTON, COULD NEVER BE QUANTIFIED INTO HOW MANY VOTES WOULD BE EITHER GAINED OR LOST. THIS MAY HAVE LED TO POSSIBLE VARIATIONS IN HOW THE FINAL VOTE COUNT COULD BE MANIPULATED.

(Which leads to the following: WHY IS THERE AN ASSUMPTION THAT RUSSIA, AND ONLY RUSSIA, COULD BE GUILTY OF TAMPERING WITH THE ELECTION RESULTS? THE RUSSIANS HACKING INTO COMPUTER FILES TO GATHER INFORMATION TO BE USED AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM INTENTIONALLY ALTERING BALLOT COUNTS).

FOR THIS EXAMPLE, LET US BRING ANOTHER ONE OF THE 6 STATES THAT CHANGED SUPPORT FROM DEMOCRAT TO REPUBLICAN FOR THE 2016 ELECTION.

WISCONSIN.

In 2016 Wisconsin the REPUBLICAN PARTY WON THE STATE BY A VOTE OF:

1,405,284- 1,382,586. Another narrow victory.

Oddly enough, they did this while accumulating LESS VOTES THAN IT HAD IN 2012.

THE REDUCTION WAS ONLY -2682, BUT IT WAS A REDUCTION. I GUESS

WISCONSIN REPUBLICANS SAW NO GREAT NEED TO TURN OUT THE VOTE.

Well, they were right. THE DEMOCRATS, WHO HAD BEATEN THE REPUBLICANS

BY ABOUT 7% OF THE VOTE IN 2012, LOST NEARLY A QUARTER OF A MILLION

VOTES IN 2016. (-238,449.).

INTERESTING.